As I hear conversations on talk radio and opinions on the television media for the past three weeks, I keep hearing four repetitive ideas why Hillary should be President.

  · First – Because Hillary is a woman and it is time for a woman to be president of the United States.

  · Second – Women feel like only a woman can relate to them.  Hillary feels our pain and struggle.

  · Third – Because Hillary can show emotion (Hillary fake cry) as a mother could.

  · Fourth – Because Hillary watched her husband work in the White House for 8 years.

Except for the abortion stance, these women seemed to be more proficient about critiquing the range of candidates by their appearances and personality than knowing the rest of the candidate’s platform.  Even when a woman was against Hillary politically, the woman caller always prefaced the sentence with ‘I feel’, meaning it was an emotion or feeling that was causing her to choose a specific stance.  I keep thinking; is this what our politics has evolved to in the past 80-90 years.  Voters are basing their vote on perception and/or feelings?  It appears that roughly half of the voting base could care less about the actual substance of the political message.  I really cannot think of a single campaign debate in my lifetime where the candidates spoke longer than the typical sound bite duration.  I wish someone could inform me when the last substantive presidential campaign ever occurred.

How would the Lincoln vs. Douglas presidential debates even mattered if women could vote in the 1850’s?  History books state these presidential debates took hours.  Lincoln was a homely man physically, women would not have voted for him.  It probably would not have mattered that Lincoln was for the abolition of slavery and the preservation of the Union.  I suspect that with female voters, slavery would have lasted longer because women would have voted for Douglas since he was a dapper man and women would be protesting the fact that their sons may be killed fighting a Civil War.

As a generality, I am going to state that:

  · Men make decisions based on their wallets and how the overarching rule(s) affects their way of achieving success.  We are hunters/gathers.

  · Women make decisions how it affects their personal and financial safety.  Women are concerned about the nest.

In the 1910’s & 1920’s as Liberalism/Socialism/Communism spread across the Western Civilization as a new economic model, it is easy to see why the US Federal government’s attention looked toward the female voter?  My theory is that the Federal Government could not expand its Federal powers with the male frontier independence mentality.  The expansive personal and financial safety government policies could be easily sold to the female voters if they were given the right to vote.  Just look at today’s existing burdensome laws and regulations, which is commonly, termed ‘The Nanny’ state.

Since the passing of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution which took effect on August 26, 1920, our country has become increasingly Liberal (Socialist) at a rate far exceeding the entire period of time from the ratification of the US Constitution to the 1920’s.  Since the 1960’s when the Baby Boomers destroyed the traditional family morally, the Federal government was more than happy to offer more personal and financial safety to the women voters.

After questioning a woman’s ability to select a presidential political candidate, I also question if the American society will allow a woman to equally compete as presidential candidate and a woman’s ability to conduct the affairs of the presidency.

When Lazio challenged Hillary for the Senate bid for the State of New York, Lazio was highly critized and his Senatorial chances were crippled because he invaded Hillary’s personal space and challenged her to sign her campaign promises on a draft contract.  If men and women are equal per the equal right amendment, shouldn’t men and women have the same rules of engagement for competition?  Why can’t a men debate a woman with the same verbiage as he debates a fellowman.  Why is it compassionate if a woman cries and if a man cries he is considered a weak sissy?

A smart campaign manger could easily place a woman’s candidate in an unfair advantage by placing a ‘Sale – Buy one get one free’ sign next to the voting booth location.  That is like a light to a month.  Women would break their necks to get to the voting booth to be disappointed by the false expectations.

With Islamic terrorism beating at the gates of the Western Civilization, how is a female president going to be taken seriously by the Islamic countries.  Muslims do not respect women or women leaders.  Donkeys have the same social status as a woman.  If Hillary did travel to an Islamic country, Hillary would be more attractive in a burka.

A woman’s mind is an ocean of feelings & emotions caused by PMS, Hormone changes, or Menopause.  How is a woman going to keep a consistent message and political platform for the four years if she cannot keep a level head for a month?  One day we are best of friends with France, two weeks later we are declaring war on them.  Are we going to give the Federal government more expansive powers with a feminine touch by creating a new department; Department of Homeland Fashion Police?  Is an executive law going to be enforced by a hissy fit or a crying episode?  Who knows what kind of irrational moves a female president could make.  Are we just going to excuse her bad political moves on PMS?

If Hillary becomes the nominated Democratic presidential candidate, I am going to make a Presidential election prediction for 2008 based on astronomy and female hormones.  It is a fact the woman’s menstrual cycle is the same duration of time as the moon’s rotation around the Earth (approx. 29 days).  Some think that the majority of women’s menstruation is in sequence with the moon’s strongest pull on the Earth.  With some quick research, I found that the moon’s strongest pull on the Earth would be approx. 15-17 October.  The Presidential election is 2 November 2008, which is about 19 days away, meaning a woman is about to PMS.  PMS brings the best out of a woman.  Men are not popular at this time.

http://www.ezpics.com/gh/PredictMoonPhase

Full moon is 15-17 Oct 2008 -à 2 Nov 2008 is approx. 19 days.  Getting close to PMS time.

http://www.saltwatertides.com/cgi-local/floridagulf.cgi

You can guarantee that many women are going to spite their male counterparts despite their political stance to vote for a fellow woman.  Hillary may be voted in as president by the Hormone Factor.

I only see one option to bring this Federal Republic back to its conservative foundation.  Repeal Women’s Suffrage or the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

For more articles of my worldview

[ Go to the main blog of Dave Kooker at http://dmkooker.townhall.com ]

** Pictures provided By Jonathan R.F. Cooke.  http://coffee.townhall.com