The Liberal (Socialist) community must be in an ideology quandary right now.  They appear to be closely approaching the cross roads where they must decide whether their social engineering ideology should promote the control of the world’s behavior and population to reduce the carbon footprint of our existence to save the planet or should fatherless welfare mother's continue to be encouraged to keep propagating to further expand the Liberal entitlement programs?  The liberal ideologies are mutually exclusive.

I like to describe the climate change Liberals as the Orwellian Liberals.  I watched the Orwellian Liberals came to age in the 1990’s.  Even though I am a conservative, I have to admit that I admire their craftiness of these political counterparts basing their expansion of social engineering as doing it for the ‘children’.  Even then when the House and Senate Republicans where still ‘Conservative’, they had a difficult time publicly debating an argument against liberal programs.  Who wanted to look like they were against the children?  In the late 1990’s when political activist scientist started publicizing the ‘Global Warming’ theory, the children were aborted for a more grandiose scheme to control social engineering.

In the Liberal argument of ‘climate change’, only human activity and living things that benefit human life is allowed debatable causes of climate change.  The Orwellian Liberals want to monitor all aspects of human activity to the granularity of our body functions and thoughts:

· Our diet choices.  Eating meat is bad since livestock creates methane.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3005740.stm

· Vehicle choices should be limited to hybrids.

· Government wants to control temperature settings on our home thermostats.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59639

· How many children a family may produce.  Population Control.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200704/NAT20070418a.html

Orwellian Liberals thrive on control.  These people are well suited and would have blended in very well in the 1920’s-1930’s Germany’s National Socialist party.

I like to describe the expansive Liberals as the Dependant Liberals.  Their re-distribution financial policies encourage individuals to sabotage their life so that they are encouraged to be dependant on the government for assistance and are rewarded for additional dependants they create.  You can’t limit their food supply or creature comforts.  The dependant liberals need their energy and the proper environment to keep creating.  There is absolutely no personal responsibility but to propagate more dependants.  Also in this group there are the individuals and government organizations that have built their careers upon supplying the dependant liberals with all of life’s necessities for the dependant class to facilitate the dependant population growth.  I personally get irritated when I hear radio ads in the Jacksonville Florida area educating the listeners of available social programs they can sigh up for.

Dependant Liberals thrive on laziness and demand that someone else is responsible for taking care of them.  An excellent example of these people would be the New Orleans Katrina hurricane survivors.  A category 5 hurricane races across the gulf toward New Orleans and these people simply waited for someone else to evacuate them from the city.  2 ½ years later these people still have made no effort to rebuild their lives in New Orleans.  They are just content to receive entitlements in another location.

The Liberal ideologies are mutually exclusive.  As with any struggle there has to be a winner and a loser on the Liberal ideology platform.

The Orwellian Liberals seem to have the political upper hand right now but there is a fatal flaw with their ideology.  Socialism cannot survive on a stagnate population.  Socialism always consumes more than it produces.  Today’s population is utilizing the financial resources of tomorrow’s generation.  The next generation does what they can to pass their deficient to their next generation until the system collapses.  Liberalism/Socialism in essence is a Ponzi scheme.

A Ponzi scheme usually offers abnormally high short-term returns in order to entice new investors.  The high returns that a Ponzi scheme advertises (and pays) require an ever-increasing flow of money from investors in order to keep the scheme going.  The system is doomed to collapse because there are little or no underlying earnings from the money received by the promoter.  Ironically Federal Regulators only calls it a Ponzi scheme when private business does this.  Without a growing future population to pay the debt, the Ponzi scheme collapses too soon.

Just look at Europe.  The current European generation is so selfish and desperate to keep socialism afloat that they sold their soul to grant residence for the peace-loving Muslims to live in their country and help to temporarily fund their social entitlements.  It does not matter that Islam wants to conquer the Western world and return it to the 7^th century or that the Sharia law does not permit their liberal European lifestyles.

My prediction is the dependant liberals will eventually prevail.  A hungry dependant doesn’t care about the environment and the government has to think about it’s own long-term survival as a vote buying democracy Nanny state.

For more articles of my worldview

[ Go to the main blog of Dave Kooker at http://dmkooker.townhall.com ]

** Pictures provided By Jonathan R.F. Cooke.  http://coffee.townhall.com