Posted by
Dave Kooker on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:57:35 PM
After watching Michael Jackson physically self-mutilate himself from a poor black male youth into a rich white woman in the pursuit of what he thought self beauty should be, it made me wonder how will America's Trans-Gender populace co-exist with president Barack Hussein Obama’s version of rationed Nationalized Healthcare. How will a inefficient government bureaucratic healthcare entity decide who will receive necessary medical care versus cosmetic medical treatments to match an individual's chosen lifestyle? If America models their rationalized healthcare like Canada or England, providers will be forbidden from taking monetary payments for any medical procedure or performing such a procedure which is not authorized by the State. The sex change procedure will ultimately be the decision of the Federal government. Will Paul accept such a medical decision like a man that he cannot be Paulette in a sex change medical procedure?
Will little Johnny's tonsillitis be promptly treated so that he can heal properly and be forced work the rice patties for the State as a teenager and adult while Grandma Jones suffering from failed kidney's is told to starve to death like Terry Shiavo because Grandma is no more useful to the State? These kind of medical decisions will be mandated and enforced by a government bureaucrat who has no vested interest in your life. I cannot understand why the American populace would allow such a right to life responsibility to be rendered to the Federal government thinking that the risk is worth taking as long as the medical bill is passed to another American citizen?
To keep favor with the alternative lifestyle crowd will the government authorize sex change procedures through the rationalized National Healthcare program to stay politically in favor with this particular voting populace? Can the government justify the decision of financing one citizen’s complete sex change of 100,000 dollars from start to finish and tell 10 elderly individuals that sorry the 10,000-dollar hip replacement or kidney replacement is not authorized? There is going to be a lot of cranky old geezers from AARP.
Nationalized healthcare is never state of the art. In the previous example of Paul to Paulette, Paul may be told to take a shot of tequila and bite down on a bullet while Dr. Marcus Welby does his magic with the scalpel. If the sex change procedure does not does not come out as expected can Paul seek legal punitive damages against the State? Probably not. The legal profession may have to seek their own bail out not being to sue the Federal government or receiving any adequate financial damages. If tongue depressors are rationed what are the chances of the legal system collecting large settlements for medical malpractice?
I am sure those types of medical decision priorities will be buried in a 5000 page legislation which the House and Senate will not read and vote on again like the previous passed Stimulus and TARP legislations. I believe that the rationed Nationalized Healthcare will be prioritized by the combination of the estimated political power of the populace demographics first then the rate of return determination of a healthy individual to the State’s workforce will receive in return for it's parasitic tyrannical existence.
Case in point, the current 'Hate Crimes' bill in the House and Senate (‘The Pedophile Protection Act’) will allow a creation of a protected class of crime victims based on sexual deviations by the perpetrator. With the Federal government promoting a higher precedence to alternative lifestyles over a majority straight populace. It is conceivable such medical decision-making is also very possible. The government decision matrix could also factor any non-medical factors; how about race, religion, or received income. In the previous example of Paul to Paulette, Paul may be told sorry this is Black History month, the Federal government is only considering blacks this month for sex changes come back in the month of March with your request. President Barack Hussein Obama’s nominated federal appellate Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the US Supreme Court could easily endorse such decisions. Her previous appellate decisions are based on empathy and racial reverse discrimination.
Conservatives may struggle at the thought of a sex change medical procedure being performed but, the conservative idea of a Privatized medicine system does not stop such a procedure as long as the individual is using their own financial resources. Rationing of National Healthcare is exactly what the adjectives mean, less of any possible available healthcare. I would challenge the Gay and Trans-Gender populace to think twice about their support for president Barack Hussein Obama and join us pesky straight conservatives and help reject the Nationalization of Healthcare in America. Perhaps be as vocal as the California protesters rallying against proposition 8.
For more articles on Dave’s Worldview
[Go to the main blog of Dave Kooker at http://dmkooker.blogtownhall.com ]If you have any comments, which you do not want to post publicly, feel free to email me at dmkooker@yahoo.com. Please include the word ‘BLOG’ in the e-mail’s title to insure that the Spam filter does not automatically delete it. Profanity and comments about my lineage do not expedite my response to you……